MIT Admits: Electric Cars Are NOT Green, Pollute MORE Than Petrol Cars

4
electric cars

Electric cars are considered pollution-free as they can help keep our cities and our planet clean. However, a recent study published by the Trancik Lab of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has revealed that electric cars are NOT as green as you think and are worse polluters than petrol and diesel cars.

The study claims that an electric Tesla Model S P100D saloon produces more carbon dioxide (at 226g per kilometer) than a petrol-driven Mitsubishi Mirage (at 192g per kilometer).

Though the MIT study has shocked green energy advocates, it is not the first time a study is raising concerns about pollution caused by electric cars. In 2016, a groundbreaking study conducted by Norway’s University of Science and Technology concluded that ‘larger electric vehicles can have higher life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions than smaller conventional vehicles.’

Independent energy experts have also debunked the ‘electric cars are green’ myth saying majority of the energy that charges the batteries of electric cars comes from the national grid.

electric carsIn the U.K for example, latest figures by the Digest of UK Energy Statistics show that 51% of energy used to charge electric cars comes from power stations that burn fossil fuels such as gas and coal. Nuclear power is responsible for 21% while just under a quarter of the power comes from renewable sources.

Also, experts say mining the huge amounts of nickel, cobalt and lithium used in the manufacturing of batteries comes at an environmental cost.

According to a 2009 study, nickel was the eighth worst metal to mine and process in terms of global warming and pollution.

Villagers who live next to the Cerro Matoso nickel mine in Colombia have reported higher rates of respiratory diseases and birth defects, the study found. Also, lithium extracted from South American deserts results in one ton of carbon dioxide for every ton of lithium carbonate produced, it added.

Nico Meilhan, a car analyst and energy expert, told the Financial Times:

“If we really cared about CO2, we’d reduce car size and weight. If you switch from oil to cobalt and lithium, you have not addressed any problem. You have just switched your problem.”


Anonymous recommends: Click Here To Surf & Download Anonymously, Protect Yourself From Any Hackers Or Spy Agencies And Get Around Censorship Filters

Click here to follow us on steemit.com, the decentralized social media platform with no censorship and get paid for your posts, likes and comments!

 
SHARE

4 COMMENTS

  1. This article bears in consideration only the today’s generation sources.
    When the sources of electricity become changed to “clean” ones like wind and solar,
    the idea of “dirty” electrical vehicles becomes nullified.
    The advantages of solar and wind generation is clearly explained here in CleanTechnica:
    https://cleantechnica.com/2016/08/17/10-solar-energy-facts-charts-everyone-know/
    (by the way a real source of information)
    Left aside electricity generation discussions, the electrical vehicles are free from causing the
    type of pollution that is mostly harmful: the pollution caused near where people are.
    In overall looking, the article about electrical vehicles been more pollutant is just plain stupid.

  2. This is just biased journalism and not putting things into proper perspective …. of course if you are just using coal base your base load that will be the case but if you were using just solar or wind the report would have an entirely different outcome. Com’on guys balanced reporting please !!

  3. Peter Jordan i am convinced the British government is lying about renewable energy claims. Renewables are simply too inefficient to keep up with consumerist demands. Trees dont grow fast enough to replace themselves at the rate we cut them down. Wind power generates little energy and you need to cover vast areas of land with turbines. Same holds true for solar panels. Both solar and wind also need ideal weather conditions to work properly which is not realistic. Ironically you end up causing serious environmental damage and destroy wildlife habitat by making enough wind turbines and solar panels to cover energy needs of technological societies. There are certainly not enough of them in the UK to make the claim that nearly half of the UKs energy comes from renewables. They know the general public is mentally lazy and will believe anything they are told as long as the government seal of approval is stamped on it.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.